A family constitution is not a legally binding document in the way a shareholders’ agreement is, but it does something a shareholders’ agreement usually cannot — it establishes, while relationships are still good, the governance principles and dispute-resolution process the family agrees to use once they are not.
Governance before there is anything to govern
Families that wait until the business has grown, or the founder has died, to define who sits on the board, how family members are admitted to management roles, and how dividends versus reinvestment decisions are made, are negotiating those rules under exactly the pressure that makes agreement hardest.
A family constitution written during a period of goodwill is worth more than the most sophisticated shareholders’ agreement drafted during a dispute.
Converting principles into enforceable terms
The constitution’s real value comes from feeding its principles into legally binding instruments — the shareholders’ agreement, the trust deed, the employment policy for family members — so the family’s shared values become enforceable terms rather than just an aspirational document.
Revisiting it as the family grows
A constitution drafted for the founder’s generation needs deliberate revision as children, in-laws and grandchildren enter the picture — a document that is never revisited becomes increasingly disconnected from the family it is meant to govern.
This note is general commentary on Nigerian legal practice and does not constitute legal advice or create a lawyer–client relationship. Outcomes depend on the specific facts and the applicable law at the time. For advice on a particular matter, speak with the firm.
Keep reading
