A recovery of premises case rises or falls on the statutory notice that precedes it — the notice to quit, and where applicable, the notice of owner’s intention to apply to recover possession. A defect in either notice is not a minor procedural issue; in most Nigerian jurisdictions it is fatal to the entire action, however strong the underlying case for possession is.
Getting the length and form right
The required notice period varies by tenancy type — monthly, quarterly, yearly — and by the applicable state tenancy law. A notice served for the wrong duration, or in the wrong form, gives the tenant’s counsel an immediate, often fatal, technical defence that has nothing to do with the merits of the landlord’s claim.
Landlords lose recovery cases far more often on the notice than on the facts. The facts rarely get argued if the notice was wrong.
Service that can be proven
A notice that was correctly drafted but cannot be proven to have been properly served — no affidavit of service, no evidence of the tenant’s actual receipt — is functionally as weak as a defective notice. Courts require clear evidence of service before treating the statutory precondition as satisfied.
Starting the case on solid ground
The discipline of getting the statutory notice right — correct period, correct form, provable service — before filing is what separates a recovery case resolved in months from one that restarts entirely after a preliminary objection succeeds a year into litigation.
This note is general commentary on Nigerian legal practice and does not constitute legal advice or create a lawyer–client relationship. Outcomes depend on the specific facts and the applicable law at the time. For advice on a particular matter, speak with the firm.
Keep reading
